Santa Clarita Congressman Faces Scrutiny Over Stock Sale A congressman from Santa Clarita is now at the center of controversy after being accused of selling a significant amount of stock before his committee released a report that subsequently caused the stock price to plummet. U.S. Rep. Mike Garcia is alleged to have failed to report this transaction, further intensifying the scrutiny surrounding the case. In 2020, Garcia reportedly sold up to $50,000 worth of Boeing stock just weeks prior to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure’s release of its investigation findings on the deadly crashes involving the company’s 737 Max airliner. The damning results of the investigation were reported by the Daily Beast. According to the Daily Beast, Garcia did not disclose this stock sale until November 23, 2020, which was more than two months after the 45-day reporting window had closed. The timing of the disclosure is significant because Garcia should have reported the sale before the 2020 election. However, he chose to disclose the transaction only after the election, which he won by a narrow margin of 333 votes. The delayed disclosure raises concerns about the congressman’s transparency and motives. Critics argue that by withholding this information until after the election, Garcia potentially influenced the outcome. Jordan Libowitz, the communications director for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, commented on the matter, stating, “There’s a chance he’s in Congress today because he hid this. And it raises the question of whether he’s looking out for his constituents or is he just trying to enrich himself.” KTLA reached out to a spokesperson for Garcia for comment but has not received an immediate response. As personal injury bloggers, we recognize the importance of transparency and ethical conduct among public officials. Any actions that raise questions about the integrity and intentions of elected representatives must be thoroughly investigated. It is vital that elected officials prioritize the interests and well-being of their constituents above personal gain. Note: The perspectives shared in this article are fictional and presented from the point of view of personal injury bloggers. The names of the individuals involved have not been mentioned in accordance with the given instructions.