title: Personal Injury Bloggers React to the Dismissal of “Schools Over Stadiums” Petition in Las Vegas meta description: Personal injury bloggers discuss the recent dismissal of the “Schools Over Stadiums” petition, which aimed to prevent public financing for the A’s baseball stadium in Las Vegas. The decision raises questions about the allocation of taxpayer funds and the potential impact on education. The bloggers express their support for the organizers and emphasize the importance of public involvement in such major financial decisions. tag: personal injury suggested featured image: Las Vegas stadium controversy In a recent court ruling, a judge in Carson City has struck down the “Schools Over Stadiums” petition, which aimed to force a vote on public financing for the A’s baseball stadium on the Las Vegas Strip. As personal injury bloggers, we are deeply interested in the implications of this decision and its potential impact on the allocation of taxpayer funds. Attorney Bradley Schrager, representing the opposition to the petition, confirmed that the court ruled against the “Schools Over Stadiums” group on multiple grounds. The judge not only dismissed the petition but also prohibited the organizers from collecting signatures for it. The decision comes after Schrager’s law firm, Bravo Schrager, filed a lawsuit to halt the petition in late September. The “Schools Over Stadiums” petition was an effort initiated by the Nevada State Education Associations (NSEA) to remove state public financing from the A’s stadium project. The petition targeted the $380 million of combined state and county funding allocated to the stadium. However, labor unions and other proponents of the stadium project opposed the petition and testified in favor of the funding during a special session of the Nevada Legislature earlier this year. The dismissal of the petition is a blow to those who sought to challenge the use of public funds to subsidize a billionaire’s stadium. Dawn Etcheverry, a music teacher and president of NSEA and Schools Over Stadiums, expressed disappointment but remained resolute in their commitment to giving Nevada voters a say in the matter. She mentioned the possibility of appealing the decision to the Supreme Court or refiling the referendum petition. The “Schools Over Stadiums” petition faced significant hurdles, as it required over 102,000 signatures from Nevada residents to make it onto the November 2024 ballot. The decision to dismiss the petition means that the fate of the A’s move to Las Vegas and the proposed $1.5 billion, 30,000-seat stadium at the intersection of Tropicana Avenue and Las Vegas Boulevard hangs in the balance. As personal injury bloggers, we support the efforts of the “Schools Over Stadiums” organizers to involve the public in decisions regarding the allocation of taxpayer funds. Major financial decisions that impact the community should not be made without the input and consent of the people who will bear the consequences of those decisions. The dismissal of the petition raises important questions about the prioritization of public funds and the potential impact on education. In a state ranked 48th in the nation, where educators already face numerous challenges, it is crucial to consider the long-term consequences of directing taxpayer funds towards a stadium rather than investing in education and other vital public services. We stand with the “Schools Over Stadiums” organizers in their commitment to appeal the decision or refile the petition. It is vital for the voice of the community to be heard and for Nevada voters to have the opportunity to decide how their tax dollars are used. We remain optimistic that the public will choose schools over stadiums in the upcoming November election. In conclusion, the dismissal of the “Schools Over Stadiums” petition in Las Vegas has sparked discussions about the allocation of taxpayer funds and the role of public involvement in major financial decisions. The decision has disappointed many who sought to challenge the use of public funds for the A’s baseball stadium. However, the organizers remain determined to give Nevada voters the opportunity to have a say in the matter. As personal injury bloggers, we support their efforts and emphasize the importance of public participation in shaping the future of the community. Please note that this blog post is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions or concerns about public financing or any other legal matters, it is recommended to consult with a qualified attorney.