Tragic Malibu Crash: Defense Attorney Claims Client Was Being Chased, Questions Arrest
Malibu, California – The devastating crash on the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu that claimed the lives of four Pepperdine University students has taken a new turn as the defense attorney for the man charged with murder, Fraser Bohm, claims that his client was being chased by another vehicle. Attorney Michael Kraut alleges that the fatal incident was a result of a road rage incident that started at Duke’s Malibu, a renowned bar and restaurant situated on PCH.
Kraut asserts that there is evidence indicating a road rage incident occurred, with the other driver chasing Bohm and attempting to force him off the road. According to Kraut, the accident occurred when Bohm accelerated to escape from the pursuer. The defense attorney claims to possess security footage that supports these assertions and even claims to have identified the driver of the other vehicle, who allegedly admitted to a family member that they drove Bohm off the road.
However, Kraut has not revealed whether the defense intends to subpoena this person or make them testify during the legal proceedings, stating that such information will be disclosed in due course. Kraut emphasizes the importance of a thorough investigation by the police and challenges the fairness of expecting the other driver to voluntarily admit fault.
Moreover, Kraut disputes the allegations of Bohm driving at speeds exceeding 100 mph. He contends that data from the vehicle’s “black box” will demonstrate that Bohm’s speed was closer to 70 mph. These claims challenge the narrative surrounding the incident and suggest that Bohm may not be solely responsible for the tragedy.
During Bohm’s recent court appearance, he pleaded not guilty to the four counts of murder in connection with the deaths of Niamh Rolston, Peyton Stewart, Asha Weir, and Deslyn Williams. Kraut argues that Bohm’s bail, which was initially set at $8 million, should be further reduced from its current $4 million because of his client’s clean driving record and the absence of conclusive evidence indicating intoxication at the time of the accident. The defense attorney believes that Bohm should be released from custody to effectively fight the charges “from the outside.”
In a surprising twist, Kraut asserts that the wrong man has been arrested and that the evidence will ultimately vindicate his client. He firmly believes that Bohm is not responsible for the tragic deaths and suggests that it was the person who caused Bohm to veer off the road and subsequently claimed to have done so intentionally.
As personal injury bloggers, it is our duty to provide insight and analysis into significant legal cases. This high-profile tragedy serves as a reminder of the complexities often surrounding criminal cases, emphasizing the importance of a thorough investigation and a fair legal process. We will continue to monitor this case closely and provide updates as more information becomes available.
Tag: Criminal Defense
Suggested Featured Image: Legal Battle in Motion
